This is the second book of the Little Book Open Series. It contains a new physical Theory of Everything based upon interacting subspace singularities on an amorphous backdrop. It provides new models for elementary particles of matter and of light. New definitions of electromagnetic and nuclear forces are provided. It provides models for the electron and meson particles.
Excerpt:
Reviewing the Basics
We have been looking at the universe in error. We have been looking at space and time, at objects and forces, particles and waves when actually all that exists is light. And we really do not understand light outside of Maxwell's Equations that shows light as an interplay of electrical and magnetic forces. But while we acknowledge the existence of these forces we actually do not understand how they exist or why they influence a charged particle. We only know that the speed of light is constant giving rise to Einstein's Theory of Relativity. We need to understand light; we need to know the basis of its construction. So here I am going to propose an entirely alternative narrative. Erasing everything that we thought about the universe, we are going to start from scratch.
We are starting with an amorphous backdrop. We cannot call it a universe because there is no space or time. And it's not nothing since it is my belief that nothing doesn't exist. It's simply without form, shape or structure.
On top of this backdrop we are going to make a simple definition or structure, that of a state of being or reality. Then we will build upon this description a model of the universe. This will consist of a number of sentences which are either axioms or derived from the preceding sentences to provide the details for this model. This is a redefinition on how we view the universe and ourselves.
Premise #1: An object is defined as an element of the domain of reality
Premise #2: A state is defined as an object’s condition
Premise #3: A nothing object is defined as the object with a Null State condition
Premise #4: A something object is defined as having a state opposite of nothing
We start the investigation with these four premises. The domain of reality is simply the model of the universe that we are trying to understand. And it is assumed that this model has elements in other words that it is understandable. If it is understandable then an object is an element and it has a state. In the number universe an object is a number (element) and it has a value. So the first separation is between nothing and something. This is the simplest of all the investigation steps.
Therefore Conclusion #1: An object can not be something and nothing
Reason: By classical logic’s law of non-contradiction (contradictory statements cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time).
Nothing doesn’t contains something and is not a part of something.
Premise #5: Essence is defined as a state that is not the Null State
This essence is something that won‘t be described until later.
Therefore Conclusion #2: A something object has essence
Therefore Conclusion #3: A nothing object does not have essence
Reason: From Premises #2 and #5
Simply something has an essence that is not nothing. But nothing is nothing.
Premise #6: Real things are defined as multiple something objects
Premise #7: Real things must be unique
Premise #8: Real things can interact
To have multiple somethings that are elements of the domain of reality means that there must exists some type of identity process. Otherwise these multiple elements would actually be the same element. And this identity process could just exist in the real things themselves giving them uniqueness and interactions.
Therefore Conclusion #4: Essence has state properties of Uniqueness
Therefore Conclusion #5: Essence has state properties of Interactions
Reason: Real things are something objects that have states and these states are states of essence
Working our way towards the universe I am stating that real things interact without saying what the interactions are. And I am also saying that all of these real things must be unique.
Premise #9: Non-real things are defined as multiple nothing objects
Premise #10: Non-real things must be unique from each other
Premise #11: Non-real things can interact with each other
These are provided for completeness. If there are multiple somethings then there may be multiple nothings. However non-real things do not have an essence.
Therefore Conclusion #6: There are no Non-real things
Reason: None real things only have one state which is the Null state. So they can not be unique and they can not interact
There is nothing unique about non-real things. And to have multiple nothings requires uniqueness. There is nothing but there are no non-real things.
Premise #12: Space is defined as an property of essence
Premise #13: Uniqueness is the space essence occupies
Premise #14: Interactions is the space essence changes
Space is a new definition required to separate multiple real things. Each real thing is unique by the space that it occupies.
Therefore Conclusion #7: Real things can not be single points in space
Reason: A point in space has no size so the essence can not be unique
Therefore Conclusion #8: Real thing’s essence must exist over space
Reason: Uniqueness is the space real things occupy. By classical logic’s law of non-contradiction (contradictory statements cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time).
This will be important when we review electromagnetic charges.
Therefore Conclusion #9: Multiple real things can not occupy the same space
Reason: Occupying the same space violates the essence uniqueness.
Therefore Conclusion #10: Nothing cannot exist over space
Reason: Nothing does not have essence and space is a property of essence.
Premise #16: Uniqueness is also the time essence occupies
Premise #17: Interactions is also the time essence changes
Time is another new definition required by a dynamic model. Here time is viewed as changes in essence, the something that is contained in real things. Nothing about movement, speed of light, or even if time is common for all real things are stated at this time.
Therefore Conclusion #11: Essence change is instantaneous across the space of a real thing
Reason: Uniqueness is defined as the space, time that essence occupies.
Therefore Conclusion #12: Nothing does not exist over time
Reason: Nothing does not have essence and time is a property of essence
Premise #18: Energy is defined as the relationship between space and time of a real thing
Premise #19: Energy flows and has a wavelength and frequency (space & time)
Therefore Conclusion #13: Real things in regular space contain no energy
Reason: Instantiates change is the same thing as infinite speed; the wavelength = 0.
This is key to the new theory. People think space and time as a universal concept and objects occupy space and takes time. But in this Theory of Amorphous space and time only exists in real things. And we see that keeping real things as unique real things eliminates the concept of internal energies. However the universe we are modeling things have internal energies. To solve this dilemma requires the use of singularity space. This is a 1/R space that is larger on the insides than on the outsides. So the definition of space only exist inside of each real thing. And the same is true with time. The space and time that we used to think as a universal concept is actually the boundary condition at the edges of these real things.
Now for a real thing energy exists from its center singularity point to the edge of its boundary. However instantaneous changes at infinite speeds over an infinite distance is a mathematically undefined operation. To define this as the speed of light requires other premises.
Premise #20: Space and time interact between real things at their boundaries.
Premise #21: The space and time must agree at these boundaries or changes will occur until they agree.
Premise #22: Subspace is defined as the conglomeration of real thing boundaries.
Premise #23: Instantaneous changes at infinite speeds over an infinite distance in singularity space is viewed as virtual light in subspace. This virtual light moves at the speed of light.
Therefore Conclusion #14: Real things with singularity space have energy that appears on their borders.
Reason: Real things in singularity space have an infinite distance for instantaneous changes of existence.
Now subspace is what we call the universe. Without real things this space wouldn't exist.
Therefore Conclusion #15: Energy is evenly distributed at the edges around the edge of the real things.
Reason: Geometrically the singularity point exists somewhere within the real thing. The energy anyplace along the edge is inversely proportional to the distance between the singularity point and the edge.
We have actually painted ourselves in the corner here when we said that singularity spaces exist in real space. We just used this notion of flat space as the distance between a real things singularity point and its edge. If our notion of flat space changes then our definition of energy would change as well. If a real thing at rest (non-moving) then its singularity point would be in the center. If it is moving then its singularity point would be off center. The different viewpoints is due to the different notions of flat space. Flat space does not exist as a universal axiom, it is derived from the singularity spaces. All of this will be explained shortly.
Premise #24: Force is defined as the interactions of real things
Therefore Conclusion #16: The force is the result on the real things virtual light on their boundary edge. This affects any other real thing that touching its border,
Reason: Interactions are a change in space and time of the real things.
Therefore Conclusion #17: The effect must be equal for affected real things.
Reason: All things being equal the definition of the substance of real things are the same.
Therefore Conclusion #18: Forces are felt at the edge of the essence of real things
Reason: The energy is evident at the edge of the real things.
Therefore Conclusion #19: Changes in energy due to a force are redistributed around a real thing
Reason: A change in energy results in a change in the distance of the singularity point and the area where the force is applied. This movement of the singularity point results in a change in energy around the object.
Premise #25: Universe is defined a subspace where real things interact with each other
Therefore Conclusion #20: All real things touch the universe to be part of it
Reason: All forces occur at the edge of real things and all forces occur (interactions) in the universe.
Premise #26: Smear is defined as adding a new dimension to real things.
Premise #27: Energy distribution must remain continuous
Therefore Conclusion #21: Dimensions can only be added by another real thing
Reason: Real things dimensions exist within themselves. To interact they must somehow interconnect. However all of their dimensions may not interconnect causing them to smear each other in different dimensions.
Premise #28: The boundary of a real thing moves at the speed of light due to internal forces.
Premise #29: The internal and external forces must balance to keep a real thing boundary stationary
Therefore Conclusion #22: A particle must be made of two or more real things where their forces keep each other in check.
Reason: Only real things have forces.
The old concept of forces reaching across the universe is erroneous. If you are feeling a force, gravity, electromagnet, its because you are in contact with the real thing that affecting you. Now this might not seem obvious but I can explain it later on.
I found only two models that satisfied Premise #29, one for matter and one for light. I'll now switch to a descriptive explanation for the model.
The following description has three sections. The first section describes physical interactions of matter and light, a unifying look at Physics. The second section describes the existence of living beings and their origins. The third section describes how order can exist across the universe.